![]() Along with her teaching and research, she has worked on numerous public history projects, including museum exhibitions at the Gettysburg National Military Park and film projects on the Civil War and Reconstruction eras. Silber has done extensive research on the Civil War over more than two decades and has written several books on the subject, including Divided Houses: Gender and the Civil War (1992), Daughters of the Union: Northern Women Fight the Civil War (2005), and most recently, This War Ain’t Over: Fighting the Civil War in New Deal America (University of North Carolina Press, 2018). Is that legitimately where we stand today in the era of Donald Trump, particularly in the wake of the ramped-up rhetoric stemming from Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report on Russia’s interference in the 2016 election and whether the Trump campaign coordinated with Moscow, or is Civil War talk just crazy hyperbole? BU Today put three questions to Nina Silber, a College of Arts & Sciences professor of history and American studies and the current president of the Society of Civil War Historians. And a poll conducted last June by Rasmussen Reports found that 31 percent of probable US voters surveyed believe “it’s likely that the United States will experience a second civil war sometime in the next five years.” It was merely just an innocent jest to also express my God-given right to express my frustrations in a joking manner … I love him just like I love any other brother or sister.A recent Washington Post headline says: “In America, talk turns to something not spoken of for 150 years: Civil war.” The story references, among others, Stanford University historian Victor Davis Hanson, who asked in a National Review essay last summer: “How, when, and why has the United States now arrived at the brink of a veritable civil war?” Another Washington Post story reports how Iowa Republican Congressman Steve King recently posted a meme warning that red states have “8 trillion bullets” in the event of a civil war. There’s no animosity or anything like that. “I understand there is a vulgar meaning to ‘Let’s go Brandon,’ but I’m not that simple-minded, no matter how I feel about him. He went on, grousing he's being attacked for exercising free speech rights. Schmeck says he stands "100% behind what I did and what I said." He told the Oregonian he's not a Trumper but thinks Biden's way off base when it comes to federal vaccine mandates. well, he posted the vid on his YouTube page. If there's any question as to whether Schmeck meant it. Biden, but I am frustrated because I think he can be doing a better job." Schmeck says he meant no disrespect, but telling the Oregonian, “At the end of the day, I have nothing against Mr. 'cause after he and the Bucs lost to the Saints, they rebounded to smoke the Panthers on Sunday.īiden weirdly repeated the phrase and then at least made it appear the insult rolled off his back, as he continued to wish Schmeck a Merry Christmas.Īs for regrets. Microsoft - which has been the NFL's tablet since 2014 - had some fun over the incident as well, tweeting instructions about how to care for the device after Brady threw it.Īs for Brady's temper this week, he's much happier now. "I think it worked out pretty well for them." "I think it was pretty good marketing for the surface at the end of the day," Brady said with a laugh. but listen to the audio, he clearly thinks he actually helped Microsoft by chucking the device into the turf. ![]() "So, I won't throw another Surface."īrady apologized for his actions. "I did get warned from the NFL on that," Brady said. ![]() though he did say league officials told him they would fine him in the future if he does it again. (via /PyvdFi30NO- SportsCenter Decem said he was only issued a warning. Tom Brady threw the tablet after his INT □
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |